Pronatal policies and the future of reproduction in the specific context of former socialist states

Main Article Content

Ankica Šobot
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7178-7416

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Šobot, A. (2022). Pronatal policies and the future of reproduction in the specific context of former socialist states. Stanovnistvo, 60(2), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.59954/stnv.506
Section
Reviews & Reflections
Author Biography

Ankica Šobot, Centre for Demographic Research, Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia

Research Associate

References

Billingsley, S., & Oláh, L. (2022). Patterns of Co‐Residential Relationships Across Cohorts in Post‐Socialist Countries: Less Time for Childbearing? Social Inclusion, 10(3), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5201

Dimitrova, E., & Kotzeva, T. (2022). Contested Parenthood: Attitudes Toward Voluntary Childlessness as a Life Strategy in Post‐Socialist Bulgaria. Social Inclusion, 10(3), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5065

Ishchanova, K. (2022). Home Alone: Exploring Childcare Options to Remove Barriers to Second Childbearing in Belarus. Social Inclusion, 10(3), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5223

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition, Population and Development Review 36(2), 211-251. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25699059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x

Lesthaeghe, R., & Neels, K. (2002). From the First to the Second Demographic Transition: An Interpretation of the Spatial Continuity of Demographic Innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland. European Journal of Population 18, 325–360. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021125800070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021125800070

Mynarska, M., & Brzozowska, Z. (2022). Things to Gain, Things to Lose: Perceived Costs and Benefits of Children and Intention to Remain Childless in Poland. Social Inclusion, 10(3), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5377

Paksi, V., Nagy, B., & Tardos, K. (2022). Perceptions of Barriers to Motherhood: Female STEM PhD Students’Changing Family Plans. Social Inclusion, 10(3), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5250

Shpakovskaya, L., & Chernova, Z. (2022). How the Everyday Logic of Pragmatic Individualism Undermines Russian State Pronatalism. Social Inclusion, 10(3), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5272

Surkyn, J., & Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value Orientations and the Second Demographic Transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An Update. Demographic research, Special Collection 3, 45-86. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.3

Szalma, I., & Takács, J. (2022). Exploring Older Men’s Pathways to Childlessness in Hungary: Did the Change of Policy Regime Matter? Social Inclusion, 10(3), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5248

Szalma, I., Hašková, H., Oláh, L., & Takács, J. (2022), Fragile Pronatalism and Reproductive Futures in European Post‐Socialist Contexts. Social Inclusion, 10(3), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.6128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.6128

Šprocha, B. (2022). Growing Childlessness and One‐Child Families in Slovakia in the Shadow of Fragile Pronatalism. Social Inclusion, 10(3),100–111. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5227